IDENTIFICATION, EVALUATION, AND COMPARISON OF HEALTH DEVICES

The technology marketplace is a veritable paradise for entrepreneurs attracted to electronic devices that can be used by consumers to enhance their personal health status. For example, a patient who has undergone breast cancer surgery may want to engage in the use of wearable sensors and cloud-based apps so that upon returning home after being discharged from the clinical setting, this individual may want to provide daily information to the health care team about her conditions and successes experienced in self-care involving physical exercise, massage, and skin care.

An article published on February 14, 2019 in the journal npj Digital Medicine indicates that recent years have witnessed an explosion in the number of wearable sensing devices and associated apps that target a wide range of biomedical metrics, from actigraphy to glucose monitoring to lung function. It is estimated that the number of connected wearable devices worldwide will increase from 325 million in 2016 to 929 million by 2021. Similarly, the digital health consumer base is growing in tandem, and it is forecasted that by 2021, the number of individuals using remote monitoring programs will grow to 52 million globally. This increased availability and choice of sensors is accompanied by a great challenge to optimize the match between the sensor and a specific application context. A structured approach is needed first to refine the requirements for a specific application, and then to evaluate the available devices against those requirements.

Increased device availability is leading to greater research and commercial opportunity, but it also can create significant confusion, especially for professionals who are attempting to select appropriate technologies that meet the requirements of their specific application for a clinical trial, research study, or a digital health service. The authors posit that there are no standardized methods to help professionals identify, evaluate, and compare the numerous human performance devices available. Consequently, they describe a framework that provides a comprehensive tool to enable users to define their specific requirements, conduct a systematic Web search and complete a holistic desk-based evaluation, to determine whether one or more devices are fit for purpose and worthy of field testing.

More Articles from TRENDS February 2019

THE PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS

Suggests a link between chemical elements and the provision of health care services in the context of social determinants. Read More

PRESIDENT’S CORNER—ASAHP MEMBER FOCUS

Gregory Frazer, Dean and Professor, Covey College of Allied Health Professions at the University of South Alabama, is featured in this issue of TRENDS. Read More

 

OPEN SEASON FOR LEGISLATION

The 116th Congress is faced with the challenge of identifying areas of bipartisan agreement in order to pass meaningful health legislation. Read More

 

HEALTH REFORM DEVELOPMENTS

Discusses the fate of the Cadillac tax in the Affordable Care Act, short-term Association Health Plans in relation to state regulations, and the impact of primary care on reducing health care costs and patient outcomes. Read More

 

DEVELOPMENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Indicates a mechanism for reducing college student debt and the results of a request for comments on a proposed rule involving Title IX provisions for campus sexual assault allegations. Read More

QUICK STAT (SHORT, TIMELY, AND TOPICAL)

  • Record Number Of Novel Medical Devices Approved By The FDA In 2018  

  • Nearly One-Quarter Of Antibiotic Prescriptions Filled Are Unnecessary 

  • Enhanced Toy Dog Robot Includes An Ability To Learn From Its Owners

  • Electrical Stimulation Of The Brain During Surgery Produces Immediate Laughter And Calm Read More

 

AVAILABLE RESOURCES ACCESSIBLE ELECTRONICALLY 

  • Adoption Of A National System For Electronic Use And Exchange Of Health Information

  • Current Status And Response To The Global Obesity Pandemic

  • How Innovation Will Blur Traditional Health Care Boundaries Read More

 

PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST AND DISPARITIES RESEARCH

Refers to disparities in language‐appropriate services in the in-patient hospital setting.  Read More