GENDER PEER EFFECTS IN DOCTORAL STEM PROGRAMS

The underrepresentation of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields can begin as early as grade school and intensify at each successive career step so that men greatly outnumber women as scientists and engineers at senior levels. This underrepresentation of women in STEM is a topic of great interest in economics and public policy today. Yet, factors affecting persistence in these fields are not well understood and understanding the nature of the situation especially is limited at the graduate education level. A step in the direction of learning more is represented by a paper released by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) last month. It describes an investigation of peer gender composition in the training process of STEM doctoral degrees.

Using year-to-year variation within doctoral programs in the fraction of each cohort that is female, researchers found that women in cohorts with no female peers are less likely to graduate within six years of initial enrollment than men, but an increase in the share of female peers in a cohort increases the probability of on-time graduation for women as compared to their male counterparts. This effect largely is driven by students in typically male programs (less than 38.5% female students in the average cohort) and by dropout behavior in the first year of enrollment. Peer gender composition has a small effect on first term GPA and no effect on the probability of obtaining research funding. The small/null findings for these two channels suggest that the results largely cannot be explained by women learning or competing more successfully in cohorts with more female peers. The findings are consistent, however, with a climate mechanism, through which more female peers create a female friendly environment that encourages women to persist in doctoral programs, despite having no significant effect on learning or financial support. Taken together, the findings indicate that peer gender composition can be a useful proxy for climate and that yearly variations in this measure can provide a useful identification strategy for investigating gender gaps in outcomes.

More Articles from TRENDS October 2018

MICROBIOME’S OMNIPRESENT UNSEEN GUESTS

The Microbiome is one of many layers that have an impact on the interaction between patients and their health caregivers. Read More

PRESIDENT’S CORNER—ASAHP MEMBER FOCUS

Patricia Prelock, Professsor and Dean of the College of Nursing and Health Sciences at the University of Vermont, is featured in this issue of TRENDS. Read More

REFLECTIONS ON AN EXPERIMENT IN DEMOCRACY

The three branches of the federal government function cooperatively in many instances to meet the needs of the populace. Read More

 

HEALTH REFORM DEVELOPMENTS

Discusses how proposed rules are aimed at providing health coverage to employees, how medical needs are addressed in the Medicaid program, and survey results of workers’ views on their health care coverage. Read More

 

DEVELOPMENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION

The U.S. Department of Education announced negotiated rulemaking for accreditation and innovation, while final Department regulations for borrower defense and gainful employment are delayed. Read More

QUICK STAT (SHORT, TIMELY, AND TOPICAL)

  • U.S. Adults Who Should Take Statins For Heart Disease Prevention Fail To Do So

  • Fast Food Consumption By U.S. Adults

  • Use of Biological Swimmers As Cargo Delivery Agents In Blood

  • Novel Devices For Studying Acute And Chronic Mechanical Stress In Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Read More

 

AVAILABLE RESOURCES ACCESSIBLE ELECTRONICALLY

  • 2017 National Healthcare Quality And Disparities Report

  • Interoperability Among Health Care Technologies

  • Enhancing High Schools As A Driver Of Individual Mobility And Community Progress Read More

 

IDENTIFICATION OF FITNESS TRENDS FOR 2019

An American College of Sports Medicine Survey describes top fitness trends for 2019, with wearable technology being in the first position. Read More